Project Access Health Delivery Indicators Report


OVERVIEW

What is Project Access Health Delivery indicators (PA HeDeI) report?

Why Project Access Health Delivery indicators (PA HeDeI) report is important?

CONTENT

PRESENTATION Narrative and Slides in PDF Format


Project Access aims continually to improve services for patients. Performance measurement is an essential element of efficiency, helping physicians and managers identify scope for improvement.

Back to top

What is Project Access Health Delivery indicators (PA HeDeI) report?

The PA HeDeI is a comparative database that helps health care providers to understand and improve their performance quality.

Health Delivery Indicators (He DeI) are measures by which PA research partners analyze health status, health system performance and characteristics among PA population.

Using a method to classify health services research, the PA HeDeI report is organized in different areas: Structure, Process and Outcomes.

The concepts of

Effectiveness (benefits of medical care measures by improvement in health),
Efficiency (relationship between health improvement and the resources required to produce them) and
Equity (whether the benefits and burdens of medical care are fairly distributed) might be viewed as intermediate outcomes of the PA medical care delivery process.

Back to top


Why Project Access Health Delivery indicators (PA HeDeI) report is important?

This quality analysis research tool assists leadership in overseeing patient care quality, understanding facility performance, and identifying opportunities for improve the program.

It also helps:

• Examine National and peer group comparisons,
• Longitudinal trending,
• Assess the effects of health care program, policy choices and data reliability,
• Guide future health care policy making
• Internal reporting
• Analyze and accurately measure outcomes with regard to community access to care, utilization, and costs.

Back to top

CONTENT

The data is collected and analyzed every month. The Pilot Study (April 2002 to March 2003) is considered as an average and used for internal comparisons.

The graphs/reports are organized in three areas:

1) Structure (view narrative and slides)
- Describes the organization and financing of the Project Access program and the population served.

2) Process (view narrative and slides)
- Describes the relationships between the patients and the providers in the course of actual care delivery.
- Reported as utilization of medical care services and procedures.
- A surrogate marker of efficiency.


3) Outcomes (view narrative and slides)
- Describes the ultimate outcome of the PA population health and well-being.
- A surrogate marker of effectiveness by examining the linkages between structure and processes.
- Three surveys are used:

1) The standardized and validated SF-12 Short Form Health Survey (4-week recall) to describe mental and physical health status of adults and to measure the outcomes of health care services. The SF-12 was used during the Pilot period and after the pilot year changed to a SF8 Short Form Survey (4-week recall), a shorter option for the same purposes. It is administrated at the enrollment and at 6 months of the enrollment.

SF-12 and SF8 scores: The PCS-12 or PCS-8 and MCS-12 or MCS-8 are scored using nor-based methods. Physical and mental regression weights and a constant for both measures come form the general U.S population. Both scales are transformed to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general U.S population. The higher the scores the better the outcome.

2) A non-validated Patient Satisfaction Survey developed by PA research team, to evaluate PA
patients’ satisfation. It consists of 9 items, 5- point Likert scale. Mail to every patient by mail

3) A non-validated Provider Satisfaction Survey developed by PA research team to evaluate
the interaction with PA providers. It consists of 14 items, 5-point Likert scale and 6 opened questions. It is sent to the PA Providers every three months.

- Clinical outcomes indicators:

A pilot Community Diabetes Educator (CoDE) project - Acollaborative diabetes education program to provide counseling on an individual basis by a specially trained community health care worker. The CoDE program delivers American Diabetes Association standards of care. Hemoglobin A1C levels are tracked on a quarterly basis and the results to date have been comparable to those achieved in the private sector. Annual ophthalmology examinations have been provided by Project Access physicians, and all patients have been screened for diabetic nephropathy and lipid abnormalities. Quality of life has been assessed utilizing a validated questionnaire upon entry into the program and will be re-assessed annually

A pilot Community Mental health Educator (CoMHW) - Emergency Department Study, a CDC investigation to evaluate the effectiveness of Project Access on emergency department utilization, hospitalization, and related costs in a major metropolitan hospital. Consented patients enrolled in PROJECT ACCESS (Study case) are compared to a Control group (patients not contacted or refused to participate).

- Return on Investment (ROI)

Back to top